Korea IP Law and Practice on Patent, Design, Trademark, Copyright, Trade Secrets and Unfair Competition
Edit This Menu
Patent Correction before Enforcement in Korea
Tags:
arbitration,
business,
copyright,
cost,
damage,
design,
dispute,
infringement,
injunction,
IP,
Korea,
lawsuit,
litigation,
patent,
PI,
procedure,
prosecution,
timeline,
trademark,
validity
Associate Mr. Dongseop Kim
Attorney at law, Patent Attorney
Education
2017 Sogang University
School of Law (J.D.)
2008 Yonsei University Dept.
of Physics (B.A.)
Qualifications
2017 Admitted to bar,
Korea
2007 Patent Attorney,
Korea
Experience
2017~present KASAN Law
Firm
2012~2014 K. J. Lee Patent
and Trademark Office
2008.1~9 Alex
International Patent and Trademark Office
Specialty
Intellectual Property
Litigation, Trade Secret Litigation, Product Liability & Consumer Claims,
Corporate Investigations & White Collar Defense, China
Cases
Smart Phone Parts Patent
Litigation and Licensing Advisory
Fair-trade Law and Act Advisory
Product Liability Law Litigation
and Advisory
Samsung Electronics Mobile
Patent Application and Registration (US, EP, CN, etc)
Samsung Electronics Patent
Strategy Conference, Patent and Design Incubation meeting, Valid Patent
Conference Advisory
Korean Intellectual Property
Office (KIPO) R&D Advisory (Patent Map, Prior Art Search)
Korea Electronics
Technology Institute (KETI) Patent Map
Korea Electronics
Association (KEA) Patent Infringement Searching Advisory
Hankook Chinaware
Trademark and Design application and registration (US, EP, CN, etc)
Tags:
arbitration,
business,
copyright,
cost,
damage,
design,
dispute,
infringement,
injunction,
IP,
Korea,
lawsuit,
litigation,
patent,
PI,
procedure,
prosecution,
timeline,
trademark,
validity
IP Litigations in Korea
Tags:
arbitration,
business,
copyright,
cost,
damage,
design,
dispute,
infringement,
injunction,
IP,
Korea,
lawsuit,
litigation,
patent,
PI,
procedure,
prosecution,
timeline,
trademark,
validity
Associate Mr. Jehyeong Yu
Attorney at law, Patent Attorney, Pharmacist
Education
2014 SungKyunKwan
University Law School (J.D.)
2008 SungKyunKwan
University School of Pharmacy (B.S. in Pharmacy)
Qualifications
2014 Admitted to bar,
Korea
2008 Pharmacist, Korea
Experience
2017~present KASAN Law
Firm
2016~2017 Ministry of Food
and Drug Safety
2014~2015 Korea Institute
of Drug Safety and Risk Management
Specialty
Health, Administrative
& Public Law, Intellectual Property
Cases
- Labelling, Advertisement
and following administrative actions
-
Clinical Trials and following
administrative actions
-
GMP issues and following
administrative actions
-
Re-evaluation, Re-examination and
following administrative actions
-
Breakthrough Designation
Legislative Advisory
-
Hospital Exemption Legislative
Advisory
-
Relief of Harm from Side Effects
of Drugs Legislative Advisory
Tags:
arbitration,
business,
copyright,
cost,
damage,
design,
dispute,
infringement,
injunction,
IP,
Korea,
lawsuit,
litigation,
patent,
PI,
procedure,
prosecution,
timeline,
trademark,
validity
Under the New Design Protection Act, a Design applicant may claim 12-months Grace Period in Korean instead of the former 6 months from September 22, 2017.
l Grace
Period for Design Applications Will Be Extended to One Year
Under the current Design
Protection Act (DPA), a design shall not be deemed to lose novelty over an
identical or similar design as long as the application for the design is filed
within six (6) months from the date when the identical or similar design was
first published. From September 22, 2017,
under the new DPA, the current six
months grace period extends to one year.
Based on 12 months grace
period under the new law, an inventor, a designer or his assignee may obtain a design
protection certificate like patent through filing an application for any
already disclosed design within 12 months from the date of novelty destroying
event. The disclosure as novelty destroying event might be done by a designer,
his assignee or a 3rd party.
In order obtain such
benefit of grace period under the Korean law, a foreign applicant must meet
substantive and procedural requirements as follows:
The applicant must claim
the novelty grace period (i) at the time of filing the application
(documentation of the previous disclosure can be submitted within 30 days from
the application date), (ii) "up until KIPO issues a final decision whether
to grant a design registration" (so an applicant can now claim the grace
period at any time while the application is still pending), (iii) when filing a
response to an opposition filed by a third party, or (iv) when filing a
response to an invalidation action filed by a third party.
l Evidence
of Priority
Under the old DPA, in
order to claim priority, an application must include drawings substantially
identical to the drawings in the foreign priority application, and a copy of
the priority application certified by the foreign government must also be
submitted.
Under the new law, KIPO furthermore
will accept other documents to confirm the details of the foreign priority
application. The applicant may use the WIPO Digital Access Service to submit
priority documents (the Service allows priority documents to be securely
exchanged between IP offices directly).
l Procedural
Points
1. Priority claim under the Paris
Convention or PCT may not apply beyond 12 months from the first disclosure.
A foreign applicant must
file a Korean patent application at KIPO with 12 months from the first
disclosure event regardless of claiming priority under the Paris Convention or
PCT. Otherwise, a foreign applicant will lose a chance to obtain a design or patent
in Korea under 12 months grace period.
2. An applicant must disclose all and
each event of invention disclosures when files an application at KIPO
When a designer or an inventor
had disclosed his design or invention several times before he has filed a
patent application before KIPO, the applicant must disclose all of them and
request benefits of 12 months grace period for all and each events of
disclosures. Otherwise, the unreported event may be a basis to deny the novelty
of the filed design or invention.
For example, (1) an
inventor disclosed an abstract about his invention in a brochure of a
conference on October 1, 2013 and (2) gave a detailed presentation about his
invention before audience in the conference on October 10, 2013 and then (3)
published his article about the invention on November 1, 2013 and further (4)
the organizer of the conference uploaded the inventor's presentation at an
official website of the conference on November 10, 2013.
In order to be safe based
on benefits of grace period under the Korean law, a designer or an inventor
must disclose all of the above 4 events and claims benefits of 12 months grace
period for all of them when he files an application at KIPO within October 1,
2014. For example, if an applicant did not report No. 4 event of posting his
presentation at the conference website, it may be a basis for denying novelty of
the invention.
However, it may be possible
to argue that the designer or the inventor could not know the event and did not
have any intent to deceive KIPO. Accordingly an applicant may probably overcome
such a hurdle but it is better to check all possible events of disclosures and
report all and each of them to KIPO. On the other hand, in case an applicant
did not disclose No. 2 event or No. 3 event, he cannot save his application
from loss of novelty by his disclosures before the filing date.
Tags:
arbitration,
business,
copyright,
cost,
damage,
design,
dispute,
infringement,
injunction,
IP,
Korea,
lawsuit,
litigation,
patent,
PI,
procedure,
prosecution,
timeline,
trademark,
validity